|
REMINDER! Regular Registration Deadline is Friday, January 12th!
Create a login account to register!
Info on registration fees can be found here. Note: Editing/addition of rooms, social activities and accompanying persons is now available. Credit card payment is also available.
Contents of this enews:
Speaker Spotlight - Article:
Convenient Approaches to Molecular Electronics
Maria A. Rampi
Professor M. A. Rampi
Dipartimento di Chimica, Via Borsari 46,
Università di Ferrara, 44100 Ferrara, Italy
E-mail: rmp (at) unife.it
Whether or not molecular species will be used in practical microelectronic
devices is still a matter of discussion. Certainly organic and organometallic
molecules deserve consideration as components of devices, both for
their electronic structure tunable with great precision by synthesis,
and for self assembling in structures that provide a convenient
route toward fabrication of functional systems.
The most accurate information about electron transfer processes through
organic molecules has been provided by a large number of studies
performed by transient spectroscopy in supramolecular systems,
D-B-A, where D and A are respectively electron donor and electron
acceptor units covalently linked by a molecular bridge, B.1
In the last decades, the exponential implementation of nanofabrication
technology and of scanning probe microscopies performances made
it possible to study electron transfer processes by measuring the
current flowing through molecules between metal electrodes in metal-molecule(s)-metal
junctions and open the door to the field of "molecular electronics".2,3 The
interest of the scientific community for this research topic is well
represented by the exponential increase of studies correlating the
electronic structure of organic molecules with the current-voltage
characteristics.
Still, after a decade of intense activity in this
field, the "conductivity" of organic
molecules seems to be elusive.4 Two main, still open problems
are possibly responsible for this deficiency. One is related to the
experimental challenge in fabricating metal-molecule(s)-metal junctions
able to provide a large number of reproducible data. The chemical and
mechanical fragility of the organic compounds, either as single molecules
or organized in self assembled monolayers (SAMs) leads often to short
circuits between the metal electrodes. The second problem is related to the
unknown role played by the metal-molecule interaction in contributing to
the "resistivity" of
a metal-molecule(s)-metal system.5
In the attempt to answer these
questions, a large number of different kind of molecular junctions
have been assembled by using a combination of sophisticated and expensive
techniques. Significantly, regardless their geometry, the behavior
of the resulting function seems to be always related to the structure of
the incorporated molecules. Each type of junction – break2,
6 and planar junctions,7,8 those based on crossed gold wires9
- incorporates specific advantages and disadvantages with respect to
fabrication, reproducibility, and application. It is interesting to note
that while a great effort was addressed to the measurement of current flowing
through single or few molecules - by using break junctions, Scanning Tunneling
Microscopy and modified Atomic Force Microscopy - only a few studies were
devoted to measuring electrical properties of molecules in large assemblies.
Certainly ultrathin layers or monolayers of organic molecules (SAMs) are
better accessible systems than single molecules for application in organic
electronics and can be incorporated more easily between two metal electrodes.
In the attempt to fabricate junctions M1-SAM//M2, able to characterize electrical
properties of organic SAMs organized on metal surface M1, a number of different
strategies have been employed to fabricate the top electrode M2: deposition
of cold gold,10 fabrication
of such as lift-off float-on Au pads,11 nano-transfer printing
technique of gold electrodes,12 deposition of functionalized single
walled carbon nanotubes,13 intercalation of ultrathin film of
conjugated polymer to prevent shortages.14,15
A convenient approach
for fabricating metal-SAM-metal junctions has been adopted by several
groups: these junctions are based on electrodes formed by hanging mercury
drops. Mercury as a liquid, atomically flat metal performs soft contact with
organic molecules organized in SAMs on solid surfaces, then preventing damages
to delicate organic structures, and can bind organic molecules via thiol
anchoring group to forms well ordered SAMs. On the basis of these characteristics,
a variety of junctions based on Hg electrodes have been assembled:
1) junctions based on two Hg electrodes, each one covered by SAMs,16,17 Hg-SAM//SAM-Hg,
2) junctions based on one Hg electrode and one solid surface consisting
of metals M (M= Au, Ag, Pt, Pd), Hg-SAM1//SAM2-M, 18-20 doped
silicon surface, Hg-SAM//Si, 21 or reconstructed graphite, Hg//SAM-graphite.22 These
junctions are characterized by the several advantages: i) they are
very easy to be assemble and relatively un-expensive, ii) they are mechanically
stable and provide reproducible results, iii) able to incorporate molecular
systems of increasing complexity iv) suitable to perform in electrical and
electrochemical mode. They have been used for studies correlating electron
transfer rate with the electronic structure of organic molecules,16-19 to
test NDR effects,20 and to study the effect of metal-molecules
interfaces.21,22 These
junctions represent indeed convenient test-beds able to provide fundamental
information in the field of molecular electronics, in spite of the
main disadvantage of incorporating an environmental unfriendly metal as Hg.
The second open question in molecular electronics is related to the nature
of the contact between molecules and the metal surface as demonstrated theoretically 23 and
experimentally. 21 A
barrier to the charge injection could lead to drops in electrostatic
potential at the interface and affect the mechanism of charge transfer
and the values of the transported current. In order to gain fundamental
information about the ability of organic molecules to transport electrons
in spite of such an unsolved problem, a convenient approach relays
on the relation holding for electron transfer tunneling mechanism,
I=Io e-βd (or Ln I/Io=-βd) (1)
that describes the dependence of the measured current I on the length of the molecule, d, through a decay factor β. In a first approximation, the β parameter, is related to the molecular electronic structure by the equation
(2)
where E is the energy of the incident electron, equal, at zero bias, to the Fermi energy of the metal contacts. For a metal-contact system, β is related to the barrier φo= (ELUMO-E) for tunneling through the molecular LUMO, or φo= (E-EHOMO) for tunneling through the molecular HOMO. Equation 2
shows the direct relationship between the β factor and the electronic structure of the organic molecules, represented by the energy of the molecular orbitals. The β parameter provides then an important correlation between the electrical property and the electronic structure of the molecules.
Measurements of current flowing through molecules of different length and same electronic structure allow to calculate the decay factor, β according to equation 1. Since the metal-molecules distance represents a constant contribution when the molecular length is varied, the unknown role of the interface does not enter into the calculation of β value. Unknown but constant parameters - as the molecule-metal interactions, the undefined interface between the two facing electrode-SAMs, or between the SAM and the top electrode - represents a contribution to the total resistance of the molecular system but do not affect the information related to the electrical properties of the backbone of organic molecular wires.
Equation 1, allows also to calculate the "resistance" of the metal-molecule
contact, for different metals and different anchoring groups.19,24 These
values can be obtained by extrapolating the linear plot Ln I/Io= -βd of
current values measured at different molecular length, to the length
corresponding to the metal-molecule distance.
In conclusion, this approach
allows for a direct correlation between the electronic structure and
the electrical properties of the backbone of the organic molecule and to
estimate the contribution of the interface metal-molecule to the total resistance
of the metal-molecules-metal system. In spite of the mentioned problems,
junctions able to supply reproducible measurements and therefore allowing
for comparisons of current values flowing through different molecules
and different metal-molecule interactions are able to provide fundamental
information. A meaningful example is represented by the studies performed
by conductive AFM 24or by junctions25 where
each electrode has been covered by SAMs incorporating molecules with
different functional head groups, then providing different types of
interactions at the interface Metal-SAM1~ SAMs-Metal. The results show
the efficiency of the electronic coupling provided by covalent, H bond,
Van der Waals interactions in electron transfer processes. Comparison of
current values flowing through junctions have recently indicated highly conjugated
units, as haxabenzacoronene, to be "transparent" to electrons respect to
aliphatic chains 26 and
redox centers incorporated in organic backbone as units for facilitating
electron transfer processes. 27
References
-
V. Balzani, Ed., Electron Transfer in Chemistry, Volume
I-V,Wiley, Weinheim 2001.
- M. A. Reed, C. Zhou, C. J. Muller, T. P. Burgin, J. M. Tour, Science 1997, 278,
253
- V. J. Langlais, R. R. Schlittler, H. Tang, A. Gourdon, C. Joachim and
J. K. Gimzewski,
Phys. Rev. Letter,1999, 83:14,
2809.
- A. Salomon, D. Cahen, S. Lindsay, J. Tomfohr, V. B. Engelkes, C.
D. Frisbie, Adv. Mater. 2003, 15,
22
- Y. Selzer, A. Salomon, D. Cahen, J. Phys. Chem. B 2002, 106, 10432.
- R. Ochs, D. Scker, M. Elbing, M. Mayor, H. B. Weber, Faraday
Discuss. 2006, 131, 281.
- H. Park, J. Park, A. K. L. Lim, E.H. Anderson, A. P. Alivisatos, P. L.
Mc Euen, Nature 2000, 407, 60.
- C. Joachim, J. K. Gimzewski, H. Tang - Physical Review B, 1998,
B 58, 16407
- A. S. Blum, J. G. Kushmerick, S. K. Pollack, J. C. Yang, M. Moore,
J. Naciri, R. Shashidhar, B. R. Ratna J. Phys.
- T. Xu, T. A. Morris, G. J. Szulczewski, R. M. Metzger, M. Szablewski, J.
Mater. Chem. 2002, 12,
3167.
- A. Vilan, A. Shanzer, D. Cahen, Nature 2000, 404,
166.
- Y. L. Loo, D.V. Lang, J. A. Rogers, P. J. W. Hsu, Nano Lett. 2003, 3,
913.
- J. He, B. Chen, A. K. Flatt, J. J. Stephenson, D. D. Condell, J. M. Tour, Nat.
Mater. 2006, 5, 63.
- H. B. Akkerman, P. W. M Blom, D. M. de Leeuw, B.de Boer Nature 2006, 441,
69.
- F. Milani, C. Grave, V. Ferri, M. A. Rampi, Chem. Phys. 2006,
in press.
- K. Slowinski, H. K. J. Fong, M. Majda, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121,
7257.
- E. Tran, M. A. Rampi, G. M.Whitesides. Angew. Chem. Int.
Engl. Ed. 2004, 43, 3835.
- R. Haag, M. A Rampi, R. E. Holmlin, G. M. Whitesides, J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1999, 103, 7895.
- R. E. Holmlin, R. Haag, M. L. Chabinyc, R. F Ismagilov,. A. E.; Cohen,
A Terfort,. M. A. Rampi, G. M. Whitesides, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123,
5075.
- J. D. Le, Y. He, T. R. Hoye, C. C Mead, R. A Kiehl,. Appl.
Phys. Lett. 2003, 83 (26), 5518.
- A. Salomon, T. Boecking, C.K. Chan, F. Amy, O. Girzshevitz, D. Cahen.
A. Khan, Phys. Rev. Letters, 2005, 95, 266808.
- F. Anariba, R. L. Mc Creery, J. Phys.Chem. 2002, 106,
10355.
- J. M. Tour, M. Kosaki, and J. M. Seminario, J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1998,120, 84863.
- V. B. Egelkes, J. M. Beebe, C. D Frisbie, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126,
14287.
- A. Noy, C. D. Frisbie, L. F. Rozsnyai, M. S. Wrighton, and C. M. Lieber, J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 7943.
- R. E. Holmlin, R. Haag, M. L. Chabinyc, R. F. Ismagilow, A. E. Cohen,
Terfort, M. A. Rampi, G. M. Whitesides, Angew. Chem. Int.
Engl. Ed 2001 40, 2316.
- M. Duati, C. Grave, N. Tcbeborateva, J. Wu, K. Müllen, A. Shaporenko,
M. Zharnikov, J. K. Kriebel, G. M. Whitesides, M. A.Rampi, Adv. Mater. 2006, 18(3),
329.
- X. Guo, J. P. Small, J.E. Klare, Y.Wang, M. S. Purewal, I. W. Tam, B.
H. Hong, R. Caldwell, L.Huang, S. O'Brien, J. Yan, R. Breslow, S. J. Wind,
J. Hone, P. Kim, C. Nuckolls, Science, 2006, 311,
356.
|
IMPORTANT DEADLINE!
Regular Registration January 12th!
NanoTech Insight
LUXOR, March 10-17th 2007
http://www.nanoinsight.net
Create your Login Account Today
|